Cookwala / For

For dietitians, food-safety officers, public-health agencies and care homes

Nutrition and food-safety rules as machine-checkable packs, derived from public guidance, applied to menus and handovers, with your review recorded by profession and outcome. Nothing is medical advice; nothing is claimed beyond what the packs say.

Why it matters to you

Four draft packs exist: basic rules for sodium, free sugars, fats, fruit and vegetables and the cold chain; care rules for children under five, pregnancy, older adults and immunocompromised people; school-meal patterns; sodium reduction. A pack moves from draft to reviewed only after a professional review with an approved outcome. On robot kitchens the same limits (hot-holding, two-stage cooling, reheating) are enforced by the device and recorded. Personal nutrition stays on the household's device; clinician-set targets belong to the clinician.

Ways in, light to deep

  1. Review a pack with the template. About two hours; your profession and outcome are recorded, your name is not.
  2. Adapt a pack to national rules. Set jurisdiction, cite the national source, record the review.
  3. Propose care rules for the people you serve. An RFC with a schema is a clinical argument that runs.
  4. Later: read aggregate outcomes from programs. Nutrition pass rates and findings, no personal data.

First success, under 15 minutes

Open profiles/humanitarian/care-vulnerable-groups.rulepack.json and the review template; mark three rules approved, changed or rejected; file the review as an issue labelled health-review. The maintainers add it to the pack's reviews.

The path after that

  1. Draft pack → your review → status reviewed
  2. Programs adopt it; findings appear in every distribution
  3. Outcomes published with methods