Cookwala / Ideas and essays

Positions we took in code, written out so you can disagree

When a machine cooks a grandmother's dish, whose knowledge is it? What does dignity mean in automated care? What may a household's robot know, and who else may know it? Cookwala made choices about these questions in schemas and vocabularies. These essays say what they were. Responses are welcome as pull requests; disagreements that change a default go through an RFC.

Essays

Open questions we have not answered

  • How a machine should cook for a person who cannot be its last sensor: today the ladder refuses sautéing, searing, frying and reducing when no one can watch, which refuses the people the care essay is written for.
  • Whether a recipe can be owned at all.
  • Whether a robot should ever cook alone in a home with children.
  • Whether aggregated demand signals are a public good or a market.
  • What a kitchen without a cook does to a household's sense of itself.
  • Whether being fed by a machine, however well, is a loss that should be named rather than designed around.

Where the arguments became rules

The facet registry's travel rules (Household Context), the never-delegable operation class (whitepaper, section 6), dish identity in the recipe format, consent on execution logs (Core section 8), the labour-or-consumer seat in governance (a seat for the people served is proposed). Your page: options, first success, flow